In Praise of Bram

In honor of Halloween, I have been re-reading Bram Stoker’s Dracula. At the same time, I’ve been sampling various film adaptations of the book – and I am struck by how many go so far wide of the mark. Upon reading the first four chapters of the novel – the Jonathan Harker chapters – you realize you are in the hands of a master. Remember his early readers had no idea Dracula was a vampire. He weaves a web of slowly dawning horror and claustrophobia, with no sudden scares but with touches of horror that will raise the hair on the back of your neck…assuming you have any.

I can think of four truly horrific moments witnessed by poor Jonathan that are almost never in any of the film versions. Take Francis Coppola’s version (please). His Dracula is so immediately weird, I don’t know why Jonathan doesn’t head for the hills at once. In the book, Dracula tosses a squirming bag to his horrible wives and Jonathan deduces from a small noise that the bag contains a child. Coppola has Drac give them a baby in full view. And please – why does he dress the wives like the onstage girl band in Cabaret? And the less said about Lucy acting like she’s starring in a low-budget porn film the better.

This weekend, I started (and quickly stopped) a version starring Jack Palance. It begins with a pack of wolves that are so OBVIOUSLY German Shepherds I expected the theme to Rin-Tin-Tin to begin playing over the credits. Jack makes a fine Drac, but when Jonathan finally escapes from his room, he finds himself in gorgeous chambers lined with tapestries and lit candles guiding him through the bright and cheery halls. Since when does the Count lights candles in his part of the castle?

The silent film Nosferatu is truly hideous – but so hideous you cannot imagine anyone believing for a moment he’s actually an eccentric, yet harmless, aristocrat in Romania.

So at this point I must vote in favor of Tod Browning’s 1931 Bela Lugosi version. Even there, they conflate Jonathan with Renfield, but at least there is a genuine attempt at Gothic horror.

Do yourself a favor. If you like horror at all, and have never read the original, prepare to be blown away. There is a reason it is considered the greatest horror novel ever written. Bravo Mr. Stoker.



2 thoughts on “In Praise of Bram

  1. I will agree with you on choosing the Bela Lagosi Dracula as the best version of this gothic tale. In its time, Legosi made many woman’s hearts go pitter pat. Best line…”I never drink,,,wine”. Check out The Horror of Dracula starring Christopher Lee…he made a dashing Dracula, more like an English lord. When he attacks Lucy (or was it Mena) ….OH MY…I had always thought of vampires as monsters up until that point. I have always adored Christopher Lee after that movie, he became one of my teenage sex fantasies.

    As for the Coppola version…I still enjoy watching it but it does have some major flaws. Interestingly he filmed it with very little CGI…stuck to using cinematic tricks only available to film makers before the 1940s…or so I heard. Loved Tom Waits crazy Renfield. The use of sex or inferred sex was way over the top….like when Dracula gets Lucy to drink his blood..he sounds like he is getting a great orgasm. Oldman totally screws up the “wolves…children of the night…” speech…makes it sound silly instead of adoring. And Keanu Reeves with an English accent…well …nuf said.

    I can’t remember the Frank Langella version of Dracula…just remember he had a gorgeous head of hair and made women swoon. Loved the stage version of Dracula…not a sound from the audience when Dracula seduces Lucy into biting her throat.

    I totally ignored the whole Twilight series…teenage romance vampires…blah! What will be next..teenage zombie movies? But wait…I think there is one! And really hate movies that mix vampires, Frankestein’s monster, werewolves and super heroes, but that’s just me.

    Happy Halloween!

    • It’s absolutely mind-boggling that film-makers veer so far off track. Those first four Jonathan Harker chapters are a blueprint and lay out the action scene by scene. I agree Christopher Lee makes a smashing Dracula. I would LOVE to see him in a faithful version of the original. But so many feel they need to screw around with Mina/Drac in a reincarnation sort of way, a romance from centuries past. No. He is not interested in romance. He is out for blood.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s